CO129-338 - Public Offices & Others - 1906 — Page 300

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

[This Document is the Property of His Britannic Majesty's Government.]

CHINA TRADE.

CONFIDENTIAL.

[41421]

No. 1.

[December 7.]

SECTION 1.

Question asked in the House of Commons, December 7, 1906.

Mr. Tillett, To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether he can now state if the new Trade-mark Law in China has yet been brought into operation; if not, whether there is any likelihood of this taking place in the near future; whether the Regulations proposed in 1904 have been amended; if so, in what manner; whether he has official reports showing that traders secure any real advantage from now depositing their trade-marks at Shanghae; and whether registration of a trade-mark in China will prevail over a prior user of the same mark.

Answer.

I fear I can add nothing to the reply given by me to the same question when put by the honourable Member on the 26th July last.

Discussion with regard to amendments to the original draft Regulations is still proceeding among the Powers interested.

[2268 g--1]

295

Page 300
Page 301

Edit History

2026-06-03 10:15:00 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
[This Document is the Property of His Britannic Majesty's Government.] CHINA TRADE. CONFIDENTIAL. [41421] No. 1. [December 7.] SECTION 1. Question asked in the House of Commons, December 7, 1906. Mr. Tillett, To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether he can now state if the new Trade-mark Law in China has yet been brought into operation; if not, whether there is any likelihood of this taking place in the near future; whether the Regulations proposed in 1904 have been amended; if so, in what manner; whether he has official reports showing that traders secure any real advantage from now depositing their trade-marks at Shanghae; and whether registration of a trade-mark in China will prevail over a prior user of the same mark. Answer. I fear I can add nothing to the reply given by me to the same question when put by the honourable Member on the 26th July last. Discussion with regard to amendments to the original draft Regulations is still proceeding among the Powers interested. [2268 g--1] 295 Page 300Page 301
Baseline (Original)
[This Document is the Property of His Britannic Majesty's Government.] CHINA TRADE. CONFIDENTIAL. [41421] No. 1. [December 7.] SECTION 1. Question asked in the House of Commons, December 7, 1906. Mr. Tillett, To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether he can now state if the new Trade-mark Law in China has yet been brought into operation if not, whether there is any likelihood of this taking place in the near future; whether the Regulations proposed in 1904 have been amended; if so, in what manner; whether he has official reports showing that traders secure any real advantage from now depositing their trade-marks at Shanghae; and whether registration of a trade-mark in China will prevail over a prior user of the same mark. Answer. I fear I can add nothing to the reply given by me to the same question when put by the honourable Member on the 26th July last. Discussion with regard to amendments to the original draft Regulations is still proceeding among the Powers interested. [2268 g--1] 295 { Page 300Page 301
2026-06-03 10:15:00 · Baseline
View content

[This Document is the Property of His Britannic Majesty's Government.]

CHINA TRADE.

CONFIDENTIAL.

[41421]

No. 1.

[December 7.]

SECTION 1.

Question asked in the House of Commons, December 7, 1906.

Mr. Tillett, To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether he can now

state if the new Trade-mark Law in China has yet been brought into operation if not, whether there is any likelihood of this taking place in the near future; whether the Regulations proposed in 1904 have been amended; if so, in what manner; whether he has official reports showing that traders secure any real advantage from now depositing their trade-marks at Shanghae; and whether registration of a trade-mark in China will prevail over a prior user of the same mark.

Answer.

I fear I can add nothing to the reply given by me to the same question when put by the honourable Member on the 26th July last.

Discussion with regard to amendments to the original draft Regulations is still proceeding among the Powers interested.

[2268 g--1]

295

{

Page 300Page 301

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.